| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 579.88 KB | Adobe PDF |
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
O presente trabalho apresenta a dialógica enquanto
perspectiva de pesquisa transdiciplinar. O texto começa por
referir o percurso seguido por Mikhail Bakthin, Paulo Freire,
Edgar Morin e Basarab Nicolescu ao trabalharem a
metodologia dialógica em suas obras. Além disso, discute a
transdiciplinaridade compreendida em seu aspecto
metodológico, como processo que ocorre em três etapas
simultâneas: análise de diferentes níveis de realidade, a lógica
do terceiro incluído e a complexidade. Buscou-se, através da
pesquisa bibliográfica, levantar pontos teóricos sobre a
dialogia e pesquisa transdisciplinas entre os autores
supracitados. Na dialógica não se rejeita nenhuma flecha do
conhecimento, o processo de conhecimento disciplinar,
multidisciplinar, pluridisciplinar, interdisciplinar fazem parte
da unidade na diversidade que compõe a transdiciplinaridade.
Nesta perspectiva, Nicolescu (2000) diz que não há superação
de um nível anterior de conhecimento, mas que os opostos coexistem e que, portanto, o princípio retroativo e de
autorregulação ocorrem simultaneamente. Por isso, é um
importante caminho metodológico para as ciências sociais.
This paper presents the dialogue as of transdisciplinary research perspective. We start presenting the route followed by Mikhail Bakhtin, Paulo Freire, Edgar Morin and Basarab Nicolescu to work dialogical methodology in their works. Further, it discusses the transdisciplinarity understood in its methodological aspect, as a process that occurs in three simultaneous steps: analysis of different levels of reality, the logic of the included and complexity. We sought, through literature, raise theoretical points on the dialogism and research transdisciplinary between the above authors. In dialogic is not rejected any arrow of knowledge, the process of disciplinary knowledge, multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary part of unity in diversity that makes up the transdisciplinarity. In this perspective, Nicolescu (2000) says there is no overcoming a previous level of knowledge, but that opposites coexist and that therefore the retroactive principle and self-regulatory occur simultaneously. So it is an important methodological approach to the social sciences.
This paper presents the dialogue as of transdisciplinary research perspective. We start presenting the route followed by Mikhail Bakhtin, Paulo Freire, Edgar Morin and Basarab Nicolescu to work dialogical methodology in their works. Further, it discusses the transdisciplinarity understood in its methodological aspect, as a process that occurs in three simultaneous steps: analysis of different levels of reality, the logic of the included and complexity. We sought, through literature, raise theoretical points on the dialogism and research transdisciplinary between the above authors. In dialogic is not rejected any arrow of knowledge, the process of disciplinary knowledge, multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary part of unity in diversity that makes up the transdisciplinarity. In this perspective, Nicolescu (2000) says there is no overcoming a previous level of knowledge, but that opposites coexist and that therefore the retroactive principle and self-regulatory occur simultaneously. So it is an important methodological approach to the social sciences.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
transdiciplinaridade método em ciências sociais pesquisa em educação transdisciplinarity method in the social sciences research in education
Contexto Educativo
Citação
Lucena, Ana Maria S.; Saraiva, Emerson S. Silva & Almeida, Luís Sérgio C. (2016). A Dialógica como Princípio Metodológico Transdisciplinar na Pesquisa em Educação. Millenium, 50 (jan/jun). Pp. 179-196