| Name: | Description: | Size: | Format: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 169.56 KB | Adobe PDF |
Advisor(s)
Abstract(s)
Introdução: A evolução da modalidade de Andebol tem promovido a sua complexificação, pelo que os treinadores tentam atenuar os efeitos que a diversidade de variáveis poderá causar na obtenção do sucesso das suas equipas. Assim, a criação de um plano estratégico para cada jogo ultrapassa os campos teórico e ideológico do treinador. Objetivos: Aferir acerca da perceção dos treinadores no que concerne a fatores influenciadores e inibidores da opção pelo desenvolvimento de ações em superioridade numérica 7x6. Métodos: Foi concebido um guião de entrevista semiestruturada, cujas categorias foram definidas a priori. Resultados: A utilização das ações em superioridade numérica 7x6 deve-se às dificuldades sentidas na criação de situações de finalização em igualdade 6x6, à necessidade de baixar o ritmo de jogo e de diminuir o contacto entre os defensores e os atletas da primeira linha ofensiva e à necessidade de contrariar sistemas defensivos profundos com marcação individual. Os entrevistados restringem ou inibem a utilização das ações 7x6 pela insuficiência de volume e frequência de treino das mesmas, pela sua utilização em momentos nos quais o resultado se encontra equilibrado ou frente a equipas rápidas a explorar as várias formas de transição ofensivas. Conclusões: Dada a incerteza do contexto de competição, não existe uma fórmula específica para tentar resolver os detalhes que o jogo desvenda. Os entrevistados consideram a tomada de decisão fundamental para o sucesso. A forma como o treinador analisa o comportamento da sua equipa e o da equipa adversária exerce influência nas decisões tomadas pelos atletas
Introduction: Handball’s evolution has promoted its complexification, so coaches try to mitigate the effects that the diversity of variables can cause in obtaining the success of their teams. Thus, the creation of a strategic plan for each game goes beyond the theoretical and ideological fields of the coach. Objectives: To assess the perception of coaches regarding influencing and inhibitors factors for the development of actions in numerical superiority (7x6). Methods: A semi-structured interview script was designed with predefined categories. Results: The use of actions in numerical superiority 7x6 is due to the difficulties felt in creating finishing situations in numeric equality (6x6), the need to lower the game’s pace and reduce contact between defenders and athletes of the first offensive line and the need to counter deep defensive systems with individual marking. The interviewees restrict or inhibit the use of 7x6 actions due to the insufficiency of their training volume and frequency and when the result is balanced or against fast teams exploring the various forms of offensive transition. Conclusion: Given the competition game’s uncertainty there is no specific formula to try to solve the details that the game unravels. Respondents choose decision-making as a key element for success in each game. The way the coach analyzes the behavior of his team and that of the opposing team exerts a huge influence on the decisions made by the athletes in the game.
Introduction: Handball’s evolution has promoted its complexification, so coaches try to mitigate the effects that the diversity of variables can cause in obtaining the success of their teams. Thus, the creation of a strategic plan for each game goes beyond the theoretical and ideological fields of the coach. Objectives: To assess the perception of coaches regarding influencing and inhibitors factors for the development of actions in numerical superiority (7x6). Methods: A semi-structured interview script was designed with predefined categories. Results: The use of actions in numerical superiority 7x6 is due to the difficulties felt in creating finishing situations in numeric equality (6x6), the need to lower the game’s pace and reduce contact between defenders and athletes of the first offensive line and the need to counter deep defensive systems with individual marking. The interviewees restrict or inhibit the use of 7x6 actions due to the insufficiency of their training volume and frequency and when the result is balanced or against fast teams exploring the various forms of offensive transition. Conclusion: Given the competition game’s uncertainty there is no specific formula to try to solve the details that the game unravels. Respondents choose decision-making as a key element for success in each game. The way the coach analyzes the behavior of his team and that of the opposing team exerts a huge influence on the decisions made by the athletes in the game.
Description
Keywords
Andebol Estratégia Jogo em superioridade numérica Organização Treinadores