| Nome: | Descrição: | Tamanho: | Formato: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.74 MB | Adobe PDF |
Autores
Orientador(es)
Resumo(s)
Would you prefer to receive a fixed rent for a period of 50 years, 75 years or perpetually? Well,
if you have chosen the perpetual option, you are absolutely right. However, when considering
a mathematical and financial approach, they may all end up roughly the same whenever the Net
Present Value (NPV) is approximately identical. It makes common sense to choose the
perpetual option even if the NPV exhibits myopia when computing the discount value of a fixed
yearly rent. After a certain period, the discount value becomes approximately the same even
when adding more yearly fixed rents. Corporations and governments issue perpetual bonds
while recognizing these may not represent a very good financing strategy and thus implying
that most of these issues are either callable or convertible on the issuer’s request.
In approaching the existing perpetual debt related NPV myopia, this paper holds two main
goals: firstly, we intend to study the behaviours of perpetual debt yields against other perpetual
instruments and, secondly, we consider the financial methods for assessing the value of money
before proposing a formula adjustment that might serve to overcome default NPV when
evaluating fixed rents in perpetuity.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Net present value Perpetual Bonds Callable Convertible
Contexto Educativo
Citação
Editora
XXVI Jornadas Luso espanholas