Repository logo
 
Publication

Comparison of the bacterial composition of two commercial composts with different physicochemical, stability and maturity properties

dc.contributor.authorSilva, Elisabete
dc.contributor.authorLopes, Ana
dc.contributor.authorCunha-Queda, Ana
dc.contributor.authorNunes, Olga
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-05T16:00:48Z
dc.date.available2016-04-05T16:00:48Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractPreviously, two municipal solid waste commercial composts (MSW1 and MSW2) were characterized. Although sharing the same type of raw material, most of their physicochemical, stability and maturity properties differed. The present study aimed to characterize them at a microbiological level, and to infer on possible relationships between the composts properties and the structure of their bacterial communities. Both the 16S rRNA gene-based PCR-DGGE profiling and 454-pyrosequencing technology showed that the structure of the bacterial communities of these composts was distinct. The bacterial community of MSW1 was more diverse than that of MSW2. Multivariate analyses revealed that the high electrical conductivity, Cu content as well as the low phytotoxity of compost MSW1, when compared to MSW2, contributed most to shape its bacterial community structure. Indeed, high abundance of halophilic (Halomonadaceae and Brevibacteriaceae) and metal resistant organisms (Brevibacteriaceae and Bacillaceae) were found in MSW1. In addition, Pseudonocardiaceae, Streptomycetaceae, Bacillaceae, and Brevibacteriaceae may have contributed to the high humic-like acids content and low phytotoxicity of MSW1. In contrast, the high organic matter content and the high density of the cultivable fungi population were the parameters most correlated with the structure of the bacterial community of compost MSW2, dominated by Corynebacteriaceae and mainly Aerococcaceae, taxonomic groups not commonly found in composts.pt_PT
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.19/3139
dc.language.isoengpt_PT
dc.peerreviewedyespt_PT
dc.publisherElsevierpt_PT
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.023pt_PT
dc.subjectBacterial communitypt_PT
dc.subjectDiversitypt_PT
dc.subjectDGGE profilingpt_PT
dc.subject454-pyrosequencingpt_PT
dc.subjectMultivariate analysispt_PT
dc.titleComparison of the bacterial composition of two commercial composts with different physicochemical, stability and maturity propertiespt_PT
dc.typejournal article
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.citation.endPage30pt_PT
oaire.citation.startPage20pt_PT
oaire.citation.titleWaste managementpt_PT
rcaap.rightsclosedAccesspt_PT
rcaap.typearticlept_PT

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Silva et al 2016 piro compost.pdf
Size:
3.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.79 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: